home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
-
- Reported by Guy Almes/Rice
-
- TEWG Minutes
-
- The TEWG met for a single session on Wednesday morning, August 1st.
- Scott Brim, Chair of TEWG, was unable to attend and asked Guy Almes to
- chair the session in his place.
-
- The session focused on sharing information about three increasingly
- important areas of Internet topology: Europe, the Pacific, and the new
- Army Supercomputer Network (ASnet).
-
- Rudiger Volk, of the University of Dortmund and a participant in RIPE,
- led a presentation and discussion of connectivity both between Europe
- and North America and within Europe. Olivier Martin of CERN also
- contributed to the discussion.
-
- Rudiger first focused on trans-Atlantic connectivity. Among the most
- important links are the following:
-
-
- o The 64kb/s line from EUnet at CWI in Amsterdam to the UUnet site in
- Virginia. This serves the EUnet community directly and serves as a
- backup for other nets, e.g., NORDUnet.
- o The 64kb/s line from NORDUnet in Stockholm to the NSFnet site at
- JvNC. This serves the NORDUnet community directly.
- o The T1 line from CERN in Geneva to the NSFnet site at Cornell
- University. This serves the EASInet community directly.
- o The 56kb/s line from INRIA near Nice to Princeton University. This
- serves users within France directly.
- o The 56kb/s satellite line from DFN/WIN in Garching to the ESnet
- site at Fermilab. This serves the DFN/WIN community within Germany
- directly.
- o The 9.6kb/s line from Karlsruhe to NYSERnet serves another
- community within Germany.
-
-
- Further, there is a planned upgrade of the DFN-to-ESnet line to use one
- of the two `fat pipes'.
-
- Rudiger and Olivier mentioned two problems that lead to asymmetric and
- sub-optimal routes to Europe:
-
-
- o The heavy use of default routes within some parts of Europe often
- result in asymmetric routes in which packets go from North America
- to Europe via some explicit route, while return packets use a
- default path. Increased deployment of dynamic routing within
- Europe should improve this situation.
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
- o The use of MX records for some European sites cause very suboptimal
- routes to be taken in some cases.
-
-
- RIPE is working with others to help solve these problems.
-
- There was a brief discussion of the situation in Britain. As a general
- rule, IP traffic from the outside world enters the UK via an
- application-level gateway in London, and is transmitted via JAnet using
- the Coloured Book protocols to individual campuses. There are several
- exceptions to this that we discussed. First, the University of Kent at
- Canterbury is on EUnet, and thus connects to Europe and thence to North
- America via CWI in Amsterdam. Also Milo Medin reported that, as part of
- the `fat pipe' to London, some British sites will be served by JAnet
- using `IP-over-X.25' techniques; this should be an improvement over the
- current use of the JAnet application-level gateway.
-
- Rudiger closed with some thoughts on a possible outline for an
- intra-European backbone. He noted that currently, the three most
- important trans-Atlantic lines are those at:
-
-
- o CWI in Amsterdam,
- o The NORDUnet hub in Stockholm, and
- o CERN in Geneva.
-
-
- There are plans upderway to upgrade the bandwidth of lines from
- Stockholm to Amsterdam and from Amsterdam to Geneva.
-
- Milo Medin, of NASA, reported on a recent meeting of PACCOM, which
- coordinates the Internet within the Pacific Rim. At the present, there
- is a 512kb/s terrestrial line from NASA/Ames to Hawaii, which serves
- Hawaii and the following other sites:
-
-
- o Japan via four 64kb/s terrestrial circuits. There is some work to
- combine these to a single 256kb/s circuit.
- o Australia via a 56kb/s satellite circuit. There is some work on
- increasing the bandwidth of this circuit within the year.
- Unfortunately, it will be quite some time until the circuit can be
- converted from satellite to terrestrial.
- o New Zealand via a 14kb/s analog circuit. There is some work on
- using better modems, and possibly real-time compression boxes, to
- increase the effective bandwidth of this line.
- o Korea via a 56kb/s circuit.
-
-
- Among the coming developments are the following:
-
-
- o The possibility of a 64kb/s line from Japan to Europe. This would
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
- complicate routing within the Pacific. The effective use of the
- current low-speed lines is eased by the ability to use default
- routing heavily from Pacific Rim countries to Hawaii.
- o Discussions of adding Singapore and Taiwan.
-
-
- In response to a question about networking to sites in Antarctica, Milo
- expressed regret over current technical problems that prevent the
- placement of a geostationary satellite there. More seriously, he
- mentioned that work is being done on networking to Antarctica.
-
- Bob Reschly, of ASnet and BRL, reported on the ongoing deployment of
- ASnet, which serves the Army supercomputer centers and other Army labs.
- The initial topology is a mixed T1/56kb/s topology centered at BRL.
- ASnet is 138.18.
-
- Connectivity to NSFnet is primarily through the ASnet site at the
- Minnesota Supercomputer Center via MRnet and CICnet. A secondary
- connection from the ASnet site in Vicksburg to the SURAnet site at
- Jackson, Mississippi and through SURAnet is planned.
-
- Several ASnet sites are also on MILnet, and a subset of these will be
- used to route traffic between ASnet and MILnet. An ASnet router at
- FIX-Ease would improve connectivity both to MILnet, to NSFnet, and to
- other parts of the Internet.
-
- One interesting technical aspect of ASnet is its planned use of crypto
- equipment on all serial lines.
-
- ASnet is openly connected to the rest of the Internet, and is to be used
- only for science/research uses within the Army.
-
- Attendees
-
-
- Guy Almes almes@rice.edu
- William Anderson wda@mitre-bedford.org
- Jeffrey Burgan jeff@nsipo.nasa.gov
- Eric Carroll eric@utcs.utoronto.ca
- Rob Coltun rcoltun@trantor.umd.edu
- Dennis Ferguson dennis@gw.ccie.utoronto.ca
- Dale Finkelson dmf@westie.unl.edu
- Vince Fuller fuller@jessica.stanford.edu
- Hellmut Golde golde@june.cs.washington.edu
- Michael Grobe grobe@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
- Phill Gross pgross@nri.reston.va.us
- Michael Hrybyk mwh@educom.edu
- Steven Hubert hubert@cac.washington.edu
- Dan Jordt danj@cac.washington.edu
- Kathy Kerby kkerby@bbn.com
- Dan Long long@bbn.com
- Olivier Martin martin@cearn.cern.ch
-
- 3
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Matt Mathis mathis@pele.psc.edu
- Milo Medin medin@nsipo.nasa.gov
- Paul Mockapetris pvm@isi.edu
- Philippe Park ppark@bbn.com
- Robert Reschly reschly@brl.mil
- Ron Roberts roberts@jessica.stanford.edu
- Ken Stetten kstetten@nrao.edu
- Roxanne Streeter streeter@nsipo.arc.nasa.gov
- Rudiger Volk rv@informatik.uni-dortmund.de
- Tom VonDeak tvondeak@nasamail.nasa.gov
- Carol Ward cward@spot.colorado.edu
- John Wieronski john@osc.edu
- Dan Wintringham danw@igloo.osc.edu
- Robert Woodburn woody@saic.com
-
-
-
- 4
-